Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2629636 Homeopathy 2016 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Hahnemann's explanatory model for homeopathy was based on an alleged ‘vital force’.•Hahnemann's views were consistent with the contemporary theory of matter.•However, the theory of the ‘vital force’ was refuted by mid-19th century.•Starting from mid-20th century biology is undergoing a paradigm shift.•The matter-and-motion paradigm was replaced by an informational/biosemiotic paradigm.

Facing claims for and against the scientific status of homeopathy, one is entitled to ask: is there a scientific model for homeopathy? In this study we reconstructed the model put forward by Hahnemann. The results showed that it was essentially based on the assumption of a ‘vital force’ exclusive to living beings. While the vital force was a basic element of 18th-century science, the existence of such a sui generis force of nature was refuted with the formulation of the law of the conservation of energy by mid-19th century. As a function of that fact for homeopathic theory, we discuss the history of the rise and demise of the theory of the vital force from the last quarter of the 18th century to 1830. Finally, we call the attention to the paradigm shift biology underwent starting at the end of the 19th century as the framework for contemporary views on the functioning of living beings and consequently, of the effects of pharmacological agents on them.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Authors
, ,