Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2636876 Women and Birth 2011 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundCommunication problems between clinicians are the most common cause of preventable adverse events in hospitals. In spite of these known risks the ‘turf wars’ between midwives and doctors continue unabated.QuestionWhat factors affect inter-professional interactions in birthing units?Participants9 doctors and 10 midwives from 10 Australian maternity units.MethodsInterpretive Interactionism was the research design. Probing in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit stories of inter-professional interactions and their perceived effects on birthing outcomes. Analysis resulted in two theoretical models of inter-professional interaction: one positive and the other negative.FindingsMidwives and doctors agree that positive interactions are collaborative, include the woman and her partner and are associated with the best possible outcomes and experiences possible. In contrast, they agree that negative interactions involve power struggles between the professionals and these are associated with adverse outcomes. All participants are able to demonstrate emotional and social competence when interacting and applied those skills sometimes. Factors related to the organisational culture within the ‘birth territory’ of a particular maternity unit seem to be predictive of the type of interactions that are likely to occur there.ConclusionInterventions to enhance inter-professional collaboration should be directed first at changing organisational structures and policies to promote easy opportunities for natural dialogue between doctors and midwives.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health
Authors
, ,