| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 263803 | Energy and Buildings | 2012 | 18 Pages |
A transition is occurring from DOE-2 to EnergyPlus in verification of residential energy code compliance, which increased the interest in the differences between these simulation tools. This study quantifies the differences between the slab-on-grade heat transfer models of DOE-2 (Winkelmann model, GCW) and EnergyPlus (the Slab model, GCS) programs for low rise energy code compliant residential buildings in hot-humid, hot-dry, temperate and cold climates of the U.S. The reliabilities of these models were also discussed by comparing them with the more detailed TRNSYS slab-on-grade model (GCT). The findings showed that, GCW calculated 10–13% higher total building loads than GCT did for identical slab-on-grade houses. GCS showed unconverged zone air temperatures and limitations for certain insulation configurations which resulted in 18–32% lower thermal loads than those calculated by GCT. When the zone air temperatures were converged, however, GCS calculated building loads within 9% of those calculated by GCT. This indicated a necessity of improvement in GCS to avoid erroneous results in residential energy code compliance calculations.
► Can EnergyPlus replace DOE-2 for residential energy code compliance calculations? ► We compared Winkelmann's, Slab and TRNSYS slab-on-grade models in EnergyPlus. ► Slab needed ≤0.1 °C zone air temperature convergence and evapotranspiration off. ► Converged Slab without evapotranspiration showed loads within 9% of TRNSYS loads. ► Winkelmann's model calculated 10–13% higher building loads than TRNSYS did.
