Comparison of Two Simulation Methods on Chinese BSN Students’ Learning

BackgroundHigh-fidelity simulation has been demonstrated to be an efficient teaching method, although high-fidelity manikins are more expensive than low- or moderate-fidelity simulation manikins. This study was designed to explore differences in outcomes related to use of moderate-fidelity versus high-fidelity simulations in Chinese nursing education.MethodA comparative, quasi-experimental design was employed among 59 junior students in a BSN program in the People’s Republic of China.ResultsThe moderate-fidelity simulation received significantly higher scores in students’ satisfaction and self-confidence ratings, while the high-fidelity simulation showed better implementation of the simulation design elements.ConclusionBoth simulation methods had beneficial outcomes for students. There is a need for additional research evaluating these simulation interventions.