Accuracy of interpreting vital signs in simulation: An empirical study of conformity between medical and nursing students

BackgroundGiven the ubiquity of collaborative practice in health care, it is critical to examine how interprofessional group members make diagnostic decisions.PurposeThis study investigated whether peer pressure leads to inaccurate interpretations and clinical decisions about patient care.MethodsAn experimental research design was used to examine whether 3rd year nursing students (n = 44), and 2nd year medical students (n = 60) students report incorrect diagnoses and vital signs that correspond to incorrect vital signs reported by confederates using a patient simulator.DiscussionStudents who reported the same incorrect vital signs they heard from confederates were likely to select a diagnosis that corresponded to these values. Qualitative analyses showed that primary reasons for conforming differed between nursing and medical students.ConclusionsIn practice, peer pressure may directly impact interprofessional decision making and patient safety.