Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2664667 | Journal of Pediatric Nursing | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
We examined concurrent validity of scores for two infant motor screening tools, the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test (HINT) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale, in 121 Canadian infants. Relationships between the two tests for the overall sample were as follows: r = -.83 at 4 to 6.5 months (n = 121; p < .01) and r = -.85 at 10 to 12.5 months (n = 109; p < .01), suggesting that the HINT, the newer of the two measures, is valid in determining motor delays. Each test has advantages and disadvantages, and practitioners should determine which one best meets their infant assessment needs.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health
Authors
Lillian Tse, Tanja A. Mayson, Sara Leo, Leanna L.S. Lee, Susan R. Harris, Virginia E. Hayes, Catherine L. Backman, Dianne Cameron, Megan Tardif,