Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2685581 e-SPEN, the European e-Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism 2007 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

SummaryBackground & AimsKnee-heel length has been validated in elderly patients as a means to estimate body height. It is accurate and conveys a sufficient precision when it is used to calculate body mass index, and body surface area. This study was undertaken to validate body height estimated from knee-heel length in middle age Caucasian adults.MethodsA population of 2789 subjects was recruited in health care centres. They had a measurement of body height, knee-heel length and body weight.ResultsKnee-heel length was positively correlated with body weight (r=0.52, p<0.0001), body height (r=0.83, p<0.0001), and negatively with age (r=−0.12, p<0.0001). Estimated body height with Chumlea's formula significantly was underestimated in men (p<0.0001) and overestimated in women (p<0.0001). A new equation was computed with a residual standard deviation on the estimation of 4.4 cm. Only 27% of the participants have an evaluation of body height at ±1 cm. This equation turned into an inaccuracy of more than 1 kg/m2 of body mass index (BMI) for 41% of population.ConclusionsKnee-heel length is not recommended to estimate body height in middle age adults. Alternative methods should be studied.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,