A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical performance of comfilcon A (Biofinity) during 12 months of continuous wear compared to other silicone-hydrogel lenses.MethodForty-five subjects were fitted in one eye with the comfilcon A (test) lens. For 22 subjects, the other eye was fitted with lotrafilcon A (group A) and for the remaining 23 subjects the other eye was fitted with balafilcon A (group B). Twelve-month data are presented on 48 measured variables.ResultsThere were no serious adverse events during the course of the study. A total of 33 subjects completed the study, with only 4 discontinuations for lens-related reasons, spread proportionately between the lenses. On preference scales, the test lens was superior to both control lenses for comfort (p < 0.05) and overall preference (p < 0.05) and in group A for vision (p < 0.05). On grading scales, the test lens scored better than both control lenses for overall comfort (p < 0.1 for group A, p < 0.05 for group B), comfort during the day (p < 0.05), end-of-day comfort (p < 0.05) and overall preference (p < 0.05), and better in group A for general vision quality (p < 0.01), night vision quality (p < 0.01) and handling (p < 0.05). All lenses performed to a comparable degree on the basis of microcysts and corneal staining. There were significant differences between lenses in producing limbal redness (p < 0.05), bulbar conjunctival hyperemia (p < 0.1) and conjunctival NaFl staining (p < 0.01) with the control lens in group A showing the greatest effect and the control lens in group B the least.ConclusionComfilcon A offers performance advantages over first generation silicone-hydrogel materials for continuous wear.