The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PurposeTo analyse the relationship between measured intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes using multiple tonometry devices.MethodsRight eyes of patients diagnosed with OHT (n = 47), normal tension glaucoma (n = 17) and POAG (n = 50) were assessed. IOP was measured in random order with four devices: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT); Pascal® dynamic contour tonometer (DCT); Reichert® ocular response analyser (ORA); and Tono-Pen® XL. CCT was then measured using a hand-held ultrasonic pachymeter. CH and CRF were derived from the air pressure to corneal reflectance relationship of the ORA data.ResultsCompared to the GAT, the Tonopen and ORA Goldmann equivalent (IOPg) and corneal compensated (IOPcc) measured higher IOP readings (F = 19.351, p < 0.001), particularly in NTG (F = 12.604, p < 0.001). DCT was closest to Goldmann IOP and had the lowest variance. CCT was significantly different (F = 8.305, p < 0.001) between the 3 conditions as was CH (F = 6.854, p = 0.002) and CRF (F = 19.653, p < 0.001). IOPcc measures were not affected by CCT. The DCT was generally not affected by corneal biomechanical factors.ConclusionThis study suggests that as the true pressure of the eye cannot be determined non-invasively, measurements from any tonometer should be interpreted with care, particularly when alterations in the corneal tissue are suspected.