Limited versus Whole-Brain Perfusion for the Indication of Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window of Acute Cerebral Ischemia

BackgroundPerfusion computed tomography (PCT) has emerged as alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessment of patients clinically qualifying for off-label thrombolysis within 4.5 to 9 hours after onset of ischemic stroke. However, disadvantage of PCT is its often limited anatomic coverage with only 2 or 3 slices when using a 4- to 64-section scanner. Our purpose was therefore to evaluate the value of 2- and 3-slice perfusion compared to whole-brain perfusion.MethodsOne hundred twenty-five patients undergoing MRI beyond 4.5 hours after symptom onset with supratentorial perfusion deficit were selected retrospectively. Accordingly to PCT slice positioning, 2 or 3 slices of the whole-brain perfusion weighted imaging data set were depicted. Volumes of infarct (using cerebral blood volume) and penumbra (using time-to-peak and cerebral blood volume) were calculated, and results were compared with 2- and 3-slice-derived volumes, respectively.ResultsWhole-brain imaging revealed a mismatch of more than 20% in 68.8% of patients (defined as 100%). Two-slice imaging detected a perfusion deficit in 72% and a mismatch in 48.8% (sensitivity = 70.9%). Three-slice imaging detected a perfusion deficit in 76% and a mismatch in 50.4% (sensitivity = 73.3%). Although there was no significant difference between 2- and 3-slice imaging (P > .23), both techniques revealed significantly less patients with mismatch compared to whole-brain coverage (P < .01).ConclusionsTwo- and 3-slice imaging like obtained with PCT on most installed CT systems to assess perfusion deficits with subsequent mismatch calculation in acute stroke outside the 4.5-hour time window is significantly inferior to whole-brain coverage and, hence, has to be considered as a less-than-ideal solution.