| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2705697 | PM&R | 2013 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
The linking process revealed similarities and differences between the 4 FOF rating scales, as well as methodologic challenges in linking instruments to the ICF. By providing a content description that allows for a direct comparison of the rating scales, the results may be helpful when choosing an appropriate rating scale assessing FOF in clinical practice and research. A further head-to-head comparison through psychometric analyses is required to recommend appropriate FOF rating scales. Studies are also needed to investigate how the overall question and response categories of a rating scale affect respondents' answers.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Stina RPT, MSc, Maria H. RPT, PhD, Gunilla ROT, PhD, Jan MD, PhD,
