| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2728407 | International Journal of Surgery Open | 2015 | 6 Pages |
•Six RCTs with an overall 2484 participants were included in this systematic review comparing pre-operative skin preparation with CHA vs PI.•SSI occurred in 6.8% (83 out of 1220) of the CHA group versus 11% (139 out of 1264) in the PI group.•Meta-analysis of preoperative surgical skin preparation with CHA vs PI was associated with a reduced risk of SSI in clean and clean-contaminated surgery.•Further studies should evaluate the effectiveness of CHA versus PI in reducing SSI across contaminated surgery.
BackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is a dreaded postoperative complication. Although preoperative skin cleansing in order to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) is standard surgical practice, there is clinical equipoise concerning whether povidone iodine (PI) or chlorhexidine alcohol (CHA) is the antiseptic agent of choice.ObjectivesTo determine whether CHA or PI is the preferred preoperative skin preparation for reducing SSI in clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated surgery.Search methodsPubMed, Embase, and gray literature sources were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing both CHA and PI between 1980 and 2014. Comparative RCTs of preoperative CHA versus PI studying SSI in clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias.Main resultWe identified six eligible studies with an overall 2484 participants. The overall rate of SSI was 6.8% in the CHA group versus 11.0% in the PI group (P < 0.0002). CHA was superior to PI in the prevention of SSI with a pooled RR of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48–0.81).ConclusionsPreoperative surgical skin preparation with CHA is more effective than PI in preventing SSI across clean and clean-contaminated surgery. Further studies should evaluate the effectiveness of CHA versus PI in contaminated surgery.
