| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2754367 | Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia | 2015 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundConventional cytogenetics and interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) identify a high-risk multiple myeloma population characterized by poor response and short survival.Patients and MethodsWe compared outcomes between high-risk and standard-risk myeloma patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HCT) at our institution between January 2005 and December 2009. High-risk myeloma was defined as −13/del(13q) or hypodiploidy in at least 2 metaphases of conventional cytogenetics, or −17/del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), hypodiploidy (< 45 chromosomes excluding −Y), or chromosome 1 abnormalities (+1q, −1p, t(1;x)) on FISH or conventional cytogenetics.ResultsOf 670 myeloma patients, 74 (11%) had high-risk myeloma. These high-risk patients had significantly lower overall response rates (74% vs. 85%; P < .01), shorter median progression-free survival (10.3 vs. 32.4 months; P < .001), and shorter overall survival (28 months vs. not reached; P < .001) than the standard-risk patients. Having only 1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality or experiencing at least very good partial remission after auto-HCT independently predicted improved progression-free survival and overall survival (P < .05) in high-risk patients.ConclusionEven in an era of novel therapies, cytogenetically identified high-risk myeloma patients have worse prognoses than standard-risk myeloma patients after auto-HCT, and having more than 1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality further reduces survival.
