| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2760395 | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | 2009 | 5 Pages |
ObjectivesTo investigate if the protective effects of xenon and isoflurane against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion damage would be additive.DesignA prospective, randomized laboratory investigation.SettingAn animal laboratory of a university hospital.ParticipantsThirty-six pigs (female German landrace).InterventionsIn an open-chest preparation with thiopental anesthesia, the left anterior descending artery was occluded to produce ischemia for 60 minutes. One hour previously, ischemic preconditioning, isoflurane (0.55 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) alone, or isoflurane together with xenon (0.55 MAC each) were started in the respective groups. A fourth (control) group received no protective intervention. Myocardial ischemia was followed by 2 hours of reperfusion.Measurements and Main ResultsHearts were excised and stained (Evans Blue/TTC) to measure infarct size as related to the area at risk. Myocardial infarct size was reduced (means ± standard deviation) from 64% ± 9% of the area at risk in the control group to 19% ± 12% with ischemic preconditioning to 46% ± 12% with isoflurane and to 39% ± 13% with isoflurane and xenon. All intervention groups were significantly different from the control (p < 0.05), and both anesthetic groups were significantly different from ischemic preconditioning (p < 0.05).ConclusionCombined isoflurane/xenon anesthesia reduced infarct size but not more than isoflurane alone. Ischemic preconditioning was more effective than the anesthetics.
