Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2768518 Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2014 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Both the ILMA-Fastrach™ and the air-Q® provided a similar rate of successful intubation, but ILMA-Fastrach™ was better for ventilation. The rate of adverse events was similar with both devices. Because no additional maneuver was used to facilitated intubation, there needs to be further studies to confirm these findings.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
, , ,