Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2768518 | Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación | 2014 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Both the ILMA-Fastrach⢠and the air-Q® provided a similar rate of successful intubation, but ILMA-Fastrach⢠was better for ventilation. The rate of adverse events was similar with both devices. Because no additional maneuver was used to facilitated intubation, there needs to be further studies to confirm these findings.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
J.C. Garzón Sánchez, T. López Correa, J.A. Sastre Rincón,