Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2771956 Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2009 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundDiagnostic discordance for osteoporosis is the presence of different categories of T-scores in 2 skeletal sites of an individual patient, falling into 2 different diagnostic categories identified by the World Health Organization classification system.ObjectivesTo evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for T-score discordance between spine and total hip measurement sites.MethodsDemographic data, anthropometric measurements, and risk factors for osteoporosis were derived from a database of 3479 patients referred to a community-based outpatient osteoporosis testing center. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed on L1-L4 lumbar spine and total hips for all cases. Minor discordance was defined as present when the difference between 2 sites was no more than 1 World Health Organization diagnostic class. Major discordance was present when 1 site is osteoporotic and the other is normal. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded.ResultsIn 3479 participants (2871 women; mean age, 55.7 ± 11.9 years), concordance of T-scores, minor discordance, and major discordance were seen in 54, 42, and 4%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, menopause, and obesity were identified as risk factors against T-score discordance.ConclusionDensitometrists and clinicians should expect that at least 4 of every 10 patients tested by DXA to demonstrate T-score discordance between spine and total hip measurement sites. T-score discordance can occur for a variety of reasons related to physiologic and pathologic patient factors as well as the performance or analysis of DXA itself.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
, , , , , , , ,