Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2779323 Bone 2012 13 Pages PDF
Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is considered as a chronic disease with a long “silent” period. The diagnosis is generally based on clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. However X-ray has a poor sensitivity and a relatively large precision error that does not allow an early detection of OA or the monitoring of joint damage progression. The limitations of the tools that are currently available for OA assessment have been the impetus to identify specific biological markers that reflect quantitative and dynamic variations in joint remodeling. Research has focused on the structural components of cartilage matrix, especially type II collagen degradation markers. In spite of a significant increase of some markers in individuals with early stage of OA, the large overlap with control subjects indicates that the current biomarkers used alone have limited diagnostic potential. However, the combination of specific markers seems to improve the prediction of disease progression at the individual level. Several types of treatment have been investigated but the lack of medications with definitively demonstrated chondroprotective activity has limited the assessment of the potential role of biomarkers for monitoring patients' responses to the treatment of OA. In this review, we will use the BIPED classification that appeared in 2006 for OA markers to describe the potential usage of a given marker [5].This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Osteoarthritis".

► At individual level, the current markers have limited diagnostic potential. ► Several markers have been shown to correlate with the burden of disease. ► The combined used of markers could assist the prediction of disease progression. ► For monitoring patients' responses to treatment markers might provide relevant information.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Developmental Biology
Authors
, ,