Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2798008 Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2008 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

AimsIn type 1 diabetic patients, some have glycemic instability while others glycemic stability. We have developed criteria for evaluating glycemic instability and investigated the factors responsible.MethodsGlycemic instability in 52 type 1 diabetic patients was assessed by the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) and M-value, and clinical characteristics of good, fair and poor control groups were compared.ResultsThe median MAGE and M-value was 6.6 mmol/L and 18.7, respectively. Then MAGE ≥6.6 mmol/L and M-value ≥18.7 was defined as poor control. In the 32 patients without detectable C-peptide levels, 18 patients (56%) showed poor control. The frequency of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes was dramatically higher in the poor control group not only in the patients as a whole but also in those without detectable C-peptide levels.ConclusionsA decreased level of C-peptide is a significant factor in glycemic instability. However, some patients have glycemic stability though β-cell function is completely depleted. The presence of ketosis or ketoacidosis at onset of diabetes may be a factor in later glycemic instability, suggesting the importance of examining patients in detail at onset of diabetes for careful follow-up to prevent progression of acute and chronic complications of diabetes.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Endocrinology
Authors
, , , , , , , , ,