Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2799087 Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2007 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

A population-based case–control proband study was undertaken to elucidate familial aggregation, independent environmental factors, and the interaction between them. A total of 7308 metabolic syndrome (MET-S) cases were identified from the Keelung community-based integrated screening programme between 1999 and 2002. The study has a case–control/family sampling design. A total of 1417 case probands were randomly selected from 3225 metabolic syndrome cases and the corresponding 2458 controls selected from 16,519 subjects without metabolic syndrome by matching on sex, age (±3 years) and place of residence. The generalized estimation equation model was used to estimate odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The risk for having metabolic syndrome among family members for cases versus control probands was 1.56-fold (1.29–1.89) after controlling for significant environmental factors. Higher risk of metabolic syndrome was found in parents than spouse. Low education against high education had 2.06-fold (1.36–3.13) risk for metabolic syndrome. Betel quid chewing was positively associated with the risk of MET-S, with 1.99-fold (1.13–3.53) risk for 1–9 pieces and 1.76-fold (0.96–3.23) risk for ≥10 pieces compared with non-chewer. Moderate and high intensity of non-occupational exercise led to 21.0% (OR = 0.79 (0.63–0.98)) and 26.0% (OR = 0.74 (0.59–0.94)) reduction in the risk for metabolic syndrome, respectively. The frequent consumption of vegetable reduced 24.0% (OR = 0.76 (0.62–0.92)) risk for MET-S. The frequent consumption of coffee was associated the increased risk for metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.32 (1.07–1.64)). The present study confirmed the risk of metabolic syndrome not only has the tendency towards familial aggregation but is affected by independent effect of environmental or individual correlates.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Endocrinology
Authors
, , , , , , ,