Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2799237 | Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice | 2006 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate if the omission of one of the glucose measurements in the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (100-g OGTT) would have influenced the final diagnosis of GDM in a Brazilian cohort. We performed a retrospective study with 75 patients with GDM. The 100-g OGTT test was performed in 65 of these women. Twenty (30.76%), 24 (36.92%) and 21 (32.32%), respectively, had two, three and four values above the normal range. The mean fasting, 1, 2 and 3 h glycemia were 109.81 ± 33.34, 206.55 ±44.09, 188.13 ± 46.52 and 142.12 ± 49.53 mg/dl, respectively. They were above the cut-off values in 52 (80%), 55 (84.61%), 56 (86.1%) and 31 (47.6%) tests. The exclusion of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd measurements would have missed, respectively, 9 (10.5%), 16 (18.8%) and 13 (15.2%) cases. The omission of the 4th measurement would miss one case (1.17%). In conclusion, in our study, the omission of the last glucose measurement in the 3 h 100-g OGTT would not have caused a significant impact on the final diagnosis of GDM. Therefore, given the potential advantages of simplifying the test in terms of cost and convenience, the abbreviation of the 100-g OGTT should be considered.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Endocrinology
Authors
Melanie Rodacki, Paulo G.S. Lacativa, Giovanna A.B. Lima, Patricia C. Peixoto, Analzira G.A. Loureiro, Marcia B. Wagman, Lenita Zajdenverg,