| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2804214 | Journal of Diabetes and its Complications | 2015 | 7 Pages |
AimTo derive a more precise estimation of carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) by meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify all available studies comparing CIMT levels between T1DM group and control group. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the difference of overall mean CIMT levels between the two groups. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot, Begg' test and Egger' test. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to investigate the influential factors on CIMT difference. The meta-analysis was conducted by STATA 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 1840 articles were obtained after searching databases; 47 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity was observed among these studies (Q = 768.75, P < 0.001, I2 = 94.0%). Compared with the control group, the T1DM group had significantly higher CIMT levels (standardized mean difference: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.75–1.28; P < 0.001). A likely source of heterogeneity was Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores and sample size ratio of patents and controls. The funnel plot did not show a skewed or asymmetrical shape, and the result of Begg' test and Egger' test was P = 0.178 and P = 0.145 respectively. Accordingly, it could be assumed that publication bias was not present.ConclusionT1DM patients have significantly increased CIMT levels compared to control subjects.
