| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2844856 | Physiology & Behavior | 2011 | 8 Pages |
The purpose of this study was to compare, using meta-analytic techniques, the effect of acute, intermediate intensity exercise on the speed and accuracy of performance of working memory tasks. It was hypothesized that acute, intermediate intensity exercise would have a significant beneficial effect on response time and that effect sizes for response time and accuracy data would differ significantly. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant, beneficial effect size for response time, g = − 1.41 (p < 0.001) but a significant detrimental effect size, g = 0.40 (p < 0.01), for accuracy. There was a significant difference between effect sizes (Zdiff = 3.85, p < 0.001). It was concluded that acute, intermediate intensity exercise has a strong beneficial effect on speed of response in working memory tasks but a low to moderate, detrimental one on accuracy. There was no support for a speed-accuracy trade-off. It was argued that exercise-induced increases in brain concentrations of catecholamines result in faster processing but increases in neural noise may negatively affect accuracy.
Research Highlights► Speed and accuracy of response are affected differently by intermediate intensity exercise. ► Intermediate intensity exercise improves response speed in working memory tasks. ► Effect size for response speed is high. ► Intermediate intensity exercise degrades accuracy of response in working memory tasks. ► Effect size for accuracy is low to moderate. ► Results are not due to a speed-accuracy trade-off.
