Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2864929 | The American Journal of the Medical Sciences | 2008 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The random-zero sphygmomanometer has been widely used in observational studies and clinical trials for blood pressure measurement. We examined the agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers among 2007 Chinese study participants aged 15 to 60 years. Three blood pressure readings were obtained by trained observers using random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers, respectively, in a random order. Overall, blood pressure readings obtained using the random-zero device were significantly lower than those obtained with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer, with a mean difference ranging from â3.0 to â2.7Â mm Hg for systolic and â1.4 to â0.9Â mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (all P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between mean blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers were high (0.90 for systolic and 0.85 for diastolic blood pressure, both P < 0.0001). In conclusion, our study indicated that there was strong agreement between blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers although blood pressure values were on average lower with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Wenjie MD, PhD, Tanika N. MPH, Jing MD, MSc, Jiang MD, PhD, L. Lee MD, Dongfeng MD, MSc, Xigui MD, Xiufang MD, Cashell E. PhD, D.C. PhD, James E. PhD, Paul K. MD, MSc,