Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2874347 | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2013 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
No significant dilatation of the AA or arch was observed after AVR or ARR, respectively, in patients when a cut-off diameter of 4.5 cm or greater was considered for replacement in patients with BAV compared with patients with TAV up to 5 years after operation. The need for aortic replacement at smaller diameters was not found.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Nada PhD, Gopal MRCS, PhD, Siôn MRCS, Oswaldo MD, Jeremy MRCS, Marjan FRCS (CTh),