Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2878231 | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2010 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis of all studies comparing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with coronary artery disease. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis and 4,821 patients were compared, of whom 3,450 patients underwent PCI and 1,371 patients underwent OPCABG. The rates of stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality were similar. The 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events and need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the OPCABG group when compared with the PCI group.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
J. James BSc(Hons), MBBS(Hons), Tristan D. MBBS, PhD, Ratnasari MBBS, Paul G. PhD, FRACS, Michael P. PhD, FRACS,