Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2879095 | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2010 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Contemporary results show that AVR for AS can be performed with low operative mortality and morbidity, although patients aged 80 years and older are at increased risk of prolonged recovery. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation may be an alternative for high-risk patients, but AVR is still appropriate for low-risk patients. The low risk of AVR supports the argument that asymptomatic patients who have a high likelihood of progression of AS may be considered for earlier surgical referral.
Keywords
PVDIRBCVAAHASTSCPBNYHAACCAVATAVIMyocardial infarctionAVRAmerican Heart AssociationNew York Heart Associationstandard deviationLoscardiopulmonary bypassCerebrovascular diseasecoronary artery diseasePeripheral vascular diseaseCOPDChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseAortic valve replacementAortic stenosisSociety of Thoracic Surgeonsstandard errorCVDCerebrovascular accidentRegression coefficientCADlength of stayconfidence intervalaortic valve areaodds ratiotranscatheter aortic valve implantationAmerican College of Cardiologyejection fraction
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
S. Chris MD, Patrick M. MD, Edwin C. MD, Richard MD, Vera H. MD, Charles J. MD, Nirat MD, Brittany MPH, Haris MA, Robert O. MD,