Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2879404 | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2010 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Use of SC technique increases the risk of significant PPR after AVR and MVR compared with IN technique independent of the size of prosthesis, degree of annular calcification, disease of the excised valve, or the implanting surgeon. Although 10-year survival is independent of suture technique, SC technique increases the risk of redo valve replacement after AVR.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Sukumaran K. FRCS (C Th), Gauraang MBBS, Oswaldo MD, Venkatachalam FRCS (C Th),