Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2886275 | Annals of Vascular Surgery | 2013 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundThe therapeutic and diagnostic approach in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has changed enormously in the last two decades with the introduction of ultrasound, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and premature motion. The aim of this study is to evaluate these changes and analyze their clinical and economic aspects.MethodsWe registered all inpatients with a diagnosis of DVT during 1994 (n = 110) and 2009 (n = 75) and their sociodemographic and clinical features in a descriptive observational design. We performed a comparison of diagnostic techniques, length of stay, inpatient complications, and costs thus derived for both series, based on 2009 prices, so that we could get comparable results.ResultsNinety-one percent of inpatients in 1994 were diagnosed by venography, whereas, in 2009, the diagnosis was based on clinical features, D-dimer, and ultrasound in 100% of patients. Inpatient treatment went from 7% LMWH in 1994 to 96% in 2009, and as outpatient from 82% acenocumarol to 90.6% LMWH. Complications decreased by 13.3%. Length of stay was 2.7 higher in 1994. Globally, the cost per patient decreased by 63.39%, based primarily on reduced length of stay.ConclusionsThe current diagnostic and therapeutic approach in DVT allows for effective treatment, fewer complications, and a drastic reduction in inpatient costs.