Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment in Symptomatic Patients with Near Total Internal Carotid Occlusion: A Prospective Nonrandomized Trial

BackgroundWe sought to prospectively evaluate clinical effects of eversion carotid endarterectomy (ECEA) versus best medical treatment of symptomatic patients with near total internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion.MethodsFrom January 2003 to December 2006, a total of 309 recently (within 12 months) symptomatic patients with near total ICA occlusion who were eligible for surgery were identified in our institution. Patients were nonrandomly divided into group A (259 patients), who underwent ECEA surgery, and group B (50 patients), who refused surgery. Patients in group B received the best medical treatment based on the opinion of the attending vascular surgeon and/or angiologist. Patients were followed for ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic accident, and neurologic mortality for 12 months.ResultsThere were no intraoperative and perioperative deaths and strokes in patients who were subjected to surgery. TIA was noted in 4 (1.5%) of these patients. There were no differences between the groups with respect to medications on discharge. Cumulative 12 month incidence of TIA, ipsilateral stroke and neurologic mortality was lower in patients who underwent ECEA than in patients on medical therapy (13 [5%] versus 12 [24%], p < 0.001; 4 [1.5%] versus 7 [14%], p < 0.001; and 4 [1.5%] versus 4 [8%], p = 0.034, respectively). Restenosis of the operated ICA was noted in 7 (3%) patients, and progression of near to total occlusion was seen in 15 (37%) patients in group B.ConclusionOur data indicate that recently (within12 months) symptomatic patients with near total ICA occlusion who underwent ECEA have lower incidence of TIA, ipsilateral stroke, and neurologic death during follow-up than medically treated patients. It appears that, at least in high-volume centers, ECEA should be favored over medical treatment for the management of these patients.