Relationship between monoclonal gammopathy and cardiac amyloid type

BackgroundProper identification of cardiac amyloid type is essential for patient management, and has historically relied upon immunohistochemical- or immunofluorescence-based methods, often correlated with serum and urine protein electrophoresis (SPEP and UPEP) with immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), and/or free light chain immunoassay (FLC). The recent implementation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis for clinical amyloid typing allows us to determine the validity of these tests to predict amyloid type. Validity of SPEP/UPEP/IFE and FLC assays in cardiac amyloid prediction was examined.MethodsRetrospective analysis of two tertiary care populations (n=143, 2001–2010), of cardiac biopsy-proven amyloidosis, was performed.ResultsAmyloid of transthyretin (ATTR) type was found in 81 (57%) of 143 patients and immunoglobulin light chain amyloid was found in the remaining 62 (43%). SPEP/UPEP/IFE detected a monoclonal gammopathy in 76 individuals, 56 with AL and 20 with ATTR amyloid and was overall a poor predictor of AL amyloid in this patient population: specificity (75%; 95% CI, 65-83%) and positive predictive value (PPV 74%; 95% CI, 63–82%). The FLC assay detected an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio in 61 patients, 53 with AL and 8 with ATTR amyloid and was a better predictor of AL amyloid type in this patient population: specificity (90%, 95% CI, 82–95%) and PPV (87%, 95% CI, 76–93%).ConclusionsATTR was the predominant amyloid type in this large cohort of endomyocardial biopsies characterized by mass spectrometry. Although FLC performs better than SPEP/UPEP/IFE, the performance of blood and urine studies for monoclonal proteins are not adequate to classify amyloid type.SummaryThis large-scale retrospective analysis of cardiac amyloidosis shows that blood and urine monoclonal protein studies are not, by themselves, robust predictors of cardiac amyloid type in patients undergoing endomyocardial biopsy.