Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2901649 | Chest | 2011 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Under optimal conditions, using standardized methods and equipment, reader visualization of small pneumoconiotic opacities does not appear to differ meaningfully, whether using CR or FSR. Variability in ILO classifications between imaging modalities appears to be considerably lower than variability among readers. The well-documented challenge of reader variability does not appear to be resolved through the use of digital imaging alone, and additional approaches must be evaluated.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
A. Scott PhD, Edward L. MD, FCCP, Michael D. PhD,