Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2917864 Heart, Lung and Circulation 2014 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundAn increasing number of very elderly patients aged ≥80 years will require aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Many are classified as high-risk surgical candidates. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been proposed as an alternative to surgical AVR (SAVR) for high-risk patients. We evaluated early clinical outcomes of very elderly patients undergoing SAVR to optimise TAVI candidate selection.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case review of 132 consecutive patients aged ≥80 years undergoing isolated SAVR (49 patients) or combined SAVR/CABG (83 patients) during February 2002–January 2010 at a single tertiary referral hospital. Risk for cardiac surgery was calculated using the logistic EuroSCORE (ESlog). Mortality and morbidity data were collected for the 30-day postoperative period.ResultsThirty-day mortality rate was 8.3% for patients undergoing SAVR (6.1% for isolated SAVR and 9.6% for SAVR/CABG). Permanent stroke occurred in 3.8% and renal insufficiency in 7.6% of the cohort. Thirty-five percent of patients had left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, 67% had advanced symptoms (NYHA class III or IV), and 42% of patients were stratified as high-risk (ESlog ≥ 20%).ConclusionsSAVR can be performed in very elderly patients with acceptable operative morbidity and mortality. The outcomes at our institution are comparable to contemporary SAVR and TAVI outcomes.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , , , ,