Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: Early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes

BackgroundFlexible left ventricular (LV) pacing configurations are a useful component of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems for preventing high LV pacing thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). A quadripolar LV lead has recently been designed with the purpose of allowing more choices in lead placement location and programming capability.ObjectiveTo verify the effectiveness of quadripolar LV leads compared to conventional bipolar LV leads implant outcomes.MethodsForty-five consecutive patients underwent implantation with either the quadripolar (n = 22; quadripolar group) or a conventional bipolar LV lead (n = 23; bipolar group). The primary outcome of the study was LV lead failure, defined as the need for lead revision or reprogramming during the first 3 months after implantation. Additionally, operative and follow-up data were prospectively noted and checked for significance between groups.ResultsThe implantation success rate in both groups was 100%. Baseline characteristics, procedure duration, and fluoroscopy time did not differ significantly between groups. Two lead dislodgments (requiring reoperation) and 4 clinical PNS were reported in the bipolar group; reprogramming of the device was sufficient to prevent PNS in 3 patients, the fourth is pending solution. One PNS successfully managed noninvasively occurred in the quadripolar group. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, event-free survival for the combined primary outcome was significantly lower in patients with quadripolar leads (P = .037).ConclusionThis prospective, controlled study provides strong evidence that CRT with the quadripolar LV lead results in low rates of dislocations and phrenic nerve stimulation.