Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2936406 International Journal of Cardiology 2006 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundIn a recent COMET trial (Lancet 362, 2003:7–13) it could be demonstrated that carvedilol ≤ 50 mg/d was superior to metoprolol tartrate ≤ 100 mg/d in the treatment of heart failure patients NYHA II–IV.ObjectivesIt was investigated whether the superiority of carvedilol with its β1, β2 and α-blocking potency will persist in a comparison to a highly selective β1-blocker with a long plasma half-time such as betaxolol.Methods255 pts. with NYHA II or III heart failure were double-blind randomized and uptitrated to either carvedilol 25 mg bid (n = 131) or betaxolol 20 mg od (n = 124).ResultsWithin 8 months left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to the same extent from 30% to 43% (carvedilol) or 31% to 43% (betaxolol) as primary endpoint (ns). 13% of the carvedilol (CAR) patients versus 15% of the betaxolol patients (BET) suffered either from cardiac death or recurrent hospitalizations (cardiac death n = 6 (CAR), n = 2 (BET), ns). The mean increase in the 6-min walk test was 63 m with CAR and 61 m with BET and the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire improved in both groups (ns). Heart rate reduction was pronounced in both groups: CAR 13.1 beats/min, BET 13.6 beats/min.ConclusionsThe long acting highly selective β1-blocker betaxolol in an adequate dosage is not inferior to carvedilol in terms of exercise tolerance, safety and effects on left ventricular function.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,