Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
297662 Nuclear Engineering and Design 2011 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

The most critical safety barrier in a nuclear power plant, the concrete containment, is prestressed by hundreds of tendons, both horizontally and vertically. The main purpose of the containment is to prevent radioactive discharge to the environment in the case of a serious internal accident. Due to creep and shrinkage of concrete and relaxation of the prestressing steel, tendon forces decrease with time. These forces are thus measured in Swedish containments with unbonded tendons at regular in-service inspections. In this paper, the prestress losses obtained from these in-service inspections are compared to losses estimated using several prediction models for creep, shrinkage and relaxation. In an attempt to increase the accuracy of these models, existing expressions for the development of shrinkage were modified using previous findings on the humidity and temperature inside two Swedish containments. The models which were used and modified for predicting creep and shrinkage were CEB-FIP Model Codes 1990 and 1999, ACI 209, Model B3 and GL2000. Eurocode 2 was used for the prediction of relaxation. The results show that the most accurate of the models were CEB/FIP MC 99 and ACI 209. Depending on the model, the accuracy of the prediction models was increased by 0.5–1.2 percentage points of prestress losses when using the modified development of shrinkage. Furthermore, it was found that the differences between the different models depend mainly on the prediction of creep. Possible explanations for the deviation between the calculated and measured models can be the influence of reinforcement on creep and shrinkage of concrete and the influence of friction on horizontal tendons.

Research highlights▶ Prestress losses in reactor containments were estimated using prediction models. ▶ The predicted prestress losses were compared to long-term measurements. ▶ The accuracy of the models was improved by considering actual drying conditions. ▶ Predictions by CEB/FIP MC 1999 and ACI 209 were closest to the measured losses.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
, ,