| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2977461 | Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2006 | 9 Pages | 
Abstract
												Adenosine stress demonstrated a higher sensitivity and dobutamine demonstrated a higher specificity with quantitative perfusion imaging. Therefore adenosine is superior for diagnostic perfusion imaging, whereas dobutamine is better suited in combination with visual imaging and in the functional assessment of a known coronary stenosis.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
												
											Authors
												Rohan MRCP, Edward MRCP, Stuart D. MD, FESC, FACC, FRCP, Rodney A. FRCP, Paolo G. MD, FESC, FACC, FAHA, FRCP, 
											