Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2979633 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2014 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
AVS aortic root replacement was not associated with greater 30-day mortality or morbidity rates than AVR root replacement. At 1 year, no differences were found in survival, valve-related morbidity, or MAVRE between the AVS and AVR groups. Of concern, 7% of AVS patients developed grade â¥2+ aortic regurgitation, emphasizing the importance of 5 to 10 years of follow-up to learn the long-term durability of AVS versus AVR root replacement in patients with MFS.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Joseph S. MD, Irina V. PhD, Scott A. MD, Thoralf M. MD, Heidi M. MD, Elizabeth H. MD, PhD, Hartzell V. MD, Dianna M. MD, PhD, Luca A. MD, Harry C. MD, Charles G. PhD, D. Craig MD,