Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2985396 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2007 | 8 Pages |
ObjectiveWe sought to compare the efficacy of conventional pulmonary artery banding with that of FloWatch pulmonary artery banding.MethodsForty consecutive infants underwent conventional pulmonary artery banding (n = 20; mean age, 1.8 ± 1.5 months; mean weight, 3.7 ± 0.7 kg) or FloWatch pulmonary artery banding (n = 20; mean age, 2.6 ± 1.3 months; mean weight, 4.1 ± 0.8 kg). Indications were preparation for biventricular repair in 16 of 20 infants, univentricular repair in 2 of 20 infants, and left ventricular retraining in 2 of 20 infants in the conventional pulmonary artery banding group versus 13 of 20, 5 of 20, and 2 of 20 infants, respectively, in the FloWatch pulmonary artery banding group. Twelve of 20 infants required preoperative mechanical ventilation in the conventional pulmonary artery banding group (mean duration, 3.3 ± 4.3 days) versus preoperative mechanical ventilation required by 14 of 20 in the FloWatch pulmonary artery banding group (mean duration, 17.5 ± 19.0 days; P < .005).ResultsThere were 3 early and 2 late deaths after conventional pulmonary artery banding (mean follow-up, 10.8 ± 9.6 months; range, 1–33 months) versus no early and 2 late deaths after FloWatch pulmonary artery banding (mean follow-up, 13.4 ± 10.4 months; range, 1–38 months). Postoperative mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit and hospital stays were significantly longer after conventional pulmonary artery banding than those after FloWatch pulmonary artery banding, respectively (10.4 ± 11.2 vs 3.0 ± 3.1 days [P < .01], 20.3 ± 19.9 vs 5.3 ± 4.6 days [P < .005], and 45.6 ± 41.6 vs 15.4 ± 6.4 days [P < .005]). Reoperation to adjust the band was required in 7 (35%) of 20 infants after conventional pulmonary artery banding, whereas no reoperations were required after FloWatch pulmonary artery banding (P < .005). Average cost of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital was, respectively, $45,000 and $45,300 cheaper with FloWatch pulmonary artery banding than average cost with conventional pulmonary artery banding, largely surpassing the cost of the device ($10,000).ConclusionsFloWatch pulmonary artery banding appears superior to conventional pulmonary artery banding because (1) reoperations are not required; (2) postoperative management is simplified and postoperative mechanical ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit, and stay in the hospital are significantly reduced; and (3) the reduction in costs of postoperative mechanical ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit, and stay in the hospital significantly outweigh the cost of the device.