Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2992310 | Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2011 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
The existing lower extremity arterial revascularization economic literature is inadequate for drawing cost-efficacy conclusions and cannot inform guidelines for open vs endovascular treatment. Overcoming this limitation will require the inclusion of cost (initial and reintervention) and patient-centric outcomes in future studies evaluating lower extremity revascularization technologies. All journals, particularly vascular journals, should enforce standard reporting guidelines of effectiveness and economic studies to enable appropriate comparative and cost-effectiveness analyses.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
James P. MSc, Mohammad Hassan MD, MPH, Nilay D. PhD, Chaithra MD, Victor M. MD, Patricia J. MLS, Thomas L. MD, Mark H. MD, Michael C. MD,