Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3027033 | Thrombosis Research | 2016 | 5 Pages |
•There is concern about managing patients who are receiving a direct oral anticoagulant and require urgent surgery/procedure.•We compared risks for thromboembolism, major bleeding and mortality in patients on dabigatran or warfarin who had urgent surgery/procedure.•The risk of these outcomes did not differ depending on treatment with dabigatran or warfarin.
BackgroundThere is concern about the management of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require an urgent surgery/procedure, especially in those who are receiving a direct oral anticoagulant such as dabigatran.MethodsWe accessed the database from RE-LY, a randomized trial comparing dabigatran (110 mg and 150 mg twice daily) with warfarin for stroke prevention in AF, to assess patients who had an urgent and elective surgery/procedure. We compared the risk for thromboembolism, major bleeding and mortality according to treatment allocation (dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg, or warfarin) or surgery/procedure type (urgent or elective). Outcomes were assessed from day-7 to day 30 after a surgery/procedure.Results353 patients (2.0% of study population) had an urgent surgery/procedure and 4168 patients (23.1% of study population) had an elective surgery/procedure. In patients on dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg and warfarin who had an urgent surgery/procedure: rates of thromboembolism were 16.1%, 7.4%, and 10.5%; rates of major bleeding were 17.0%, 17.6%, and 22.9%; rates of mortality were 6.3%, 1.5%, and 2.9%, respectively (P > 0.50 for all comparisons). Rates of these outcomes were multi-fold higher in patients having an urgent rather than an elective surgery/procedure (P < 0.5 for all comparisons).ConclusionIn anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation who require an urgent surgery/procedure, the risks for thromboembolism, major bleeding and mortality did not differ depending on treatment with dabigatran or warfarin, but rates of these outcomes were multi-fold higher than in patients having an elective surgery/procedure.