Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3043815 Clinical Neurophysiology 2011 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveThe study aimed to test whether pain and pain expectation affect corticospinal excitability.MethodsTranscranial magnetic stimulation was used to measure corticospinal excitability among 15 subjects in five experimental conditions in which thermic stimulations were applied to the hand: (1) neutral stimulus; (2) actual heat; (3) actual pain; (4) expected heat; and (5) expected pain. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded in two intrinsic hand muscles.ResultsA significant difference was found between experimental conditions for both muscles (p < 0.005). Contrast analysis showed that actual pain led to a significant corticospinal inhibition compared with both neutral and actual heat conditions, whereas no effect was observed during pain expectation.ConclusionsOur results suggest that acute pain (low-to-moderate intensity (∼3/10)) does elicit motor inhibition but that its expectation does not.SignificanceThe fact that low and short-lasting pain can induce motor inhibition suggests that even moderate pain might interfere with optimal motor function in patients with both pain and motor deficits.

► Brief phasic painful stimuli of low-to-moderate intensity are sufficient to exert an inhibitory effect on corticospinal excitability. ► This inhibitory effect is specific to painful stimuli as non-painful heat stimuli did not induce such a modulation. ► Pain expectation did not produce a significant corticospinal inhibition.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neurology
Authors
, ,