Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3046589 Clinical Neurophysiology 2008 14 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveWe examined the impact of perceptual load by manipulating interstimulus interval (ISI) in two auditory selective attention studies that varied in the difficulty of the target discrimination.MethodsIn the paradigm, channels were separated by frequency and target/deviant tones were softer in intensity. Three ISI conditions were presented: fast (300 ms), medium (600 ms) and slow (900 ms). Behavioral (accuracy and RT) and electrophysiological measures (Nd, P3b) were observed.ResultsIn both studies, participants evidenced poorer accuracy during the fast ISI condition than the slow suggesting that ISI impacted task difficulty. However, none of the three measures of processing examined, Nd amplitude, P3b amplitude elicited by unattended deviant stimuli, or false alarms to unattended deviants, were impacted by ISI in the manner predicted by perceptual load theory.ConclusionsThe prediction based on perceptual load theory, that there would be more processing of irrelevant stimuli under conditions of low as compared to high perceptual load, was not supported in these auditory studies.SignificanceTask difficulty/perceptual load impacts the processing of irrelevant stimuli in the auditory modality differently than predicted by perceptual load theory, and perhaps differently than in the visual modality.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neurology
Authors
, , , , ,