Presurgical language lateralization assessment by fMRI and dichotic listening of pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy

•Language lateralization was assessed in 19 pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery.•The assessment involved fMRI and an independent behavioral measure; dichotic listening.•A two step analysis was employed combining fMRI and dichotic listening data.•For 74% of the subjects a conclusion was reached about hemispheric language dominance.•The rate of conclusive assessments in this study is comparable to reported rates on similar challenged pediatric populations.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of a method to assess hemispheric language dominance in pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery. The method is designed for patients but has previously been evaluated with healthy children.MethodsNineteen patients, 8–18 years old, with intractable epilepsy and candidates for epilepsy surgery were assessed. The assessment consisted of two functional MRI protocols (fMRI) intended to target frontal and posterior language networks respectively, and a behavioral dichotic listening task (DL). Regional left/right indices for each fMRI task from the frontal, temporal and parietal lobe were calculated, and left/right indices of the DL task were calculated from responses of consonants and vowels, separately. A quantitative analysis of each patient's data set was done in two steps based on clearly specified criteria. First, fMRI data and DL data were analyzed separately to determine whether the result from each of these assessments were conclusive or not. Thereafter, the results from the individual assessments were combined to reach a final conclusion regarding hemispheric language dominance.ResultsFor 14 of the 19 subjects (74%) a conclusion was reached about their hemispheric language dominance. Nine subjects had a left-sided and five subjects had a right-sided hemispheric dominance. In three cases (16%) DL provided critical data to reach a conclusive result.ConclusionsThe success rate of conclusive language lateralization assessments in this study is comparable to reported rates on similar challenged pediatric populations. The results are promising but data from more patients than in the present study will be required to conclude on the clinical applicability of the method.