Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3096905 World Neurosurgery 2012 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveIn patients with intractable epilepsy, failure to localize and/or resect the epileptic focus after invasive monitoring is multifactorial. Rarely do these patients return for a second invasive evaluation, and their outcome is not clearly characterized. This study aims to determine the seizure outcome after a second invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) evaluation, and its possible predictors.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent two or more invasive evaluations at Cleveland Clinic between 1980 and 2007. Clinical, surgical, imaging, and pathology information was analyzed using a multivariate regression model. A favorable outcome was defined as complete seizure freedom, allowing for auras and seizures restricted to the first postoperative week.ResultsTen patients (33%) became seizure free after the second operation (mean follow-up duration 3.13 years [range 6 months–17 years]). Seizure freedom was more likely in patients reporting fewer seizures per month preoperatively (mean 19 seizures/mo), and in those with a predominantly regional/lateralized scalp EEG ictal pattern (32% seizure free), as opposed to those with higher seizure frequency (mean 70 seizures/month; P = 0.02) or diffuse ictal EEGs (0% seizure free; P = 0.04). There was a significant association between acute postoperative seizures and failure of repeat surgery (P = 0.0083). In 17 of 30 patients, at least one complication was reported (57%) after the second invasive evaluation compared with a complication rate of 23% after the first invasive evaluation.ConclusionsA second invasive evaluation may lead to seizure freedom in one-third of patients. However, this must be weighed against the increased complication rate with reoperation.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neurology
Authors
, , , , , ,