Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3103831 | World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion | 2012 | 7 Pages |
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy differences between acupuncture and western medicine in treating osteoarthritis of knee joints.MethodsOne hundred and twenty cases were randomly divided into an acupuncture group and a western medication group with 60 cases in each group. In the acupuncture group, acupuncture was applied mainly at Nèixīyăn ( EX-LE 4), Dúbí ( ST 35), Yīnlíngquán ( SP 9) and Yánglíngquán ( GB 34) plus other acupoints selected according to syndrome differentiation. In the medication group, Glucosamine Hydrochloride capsules were orally given 3 times daily with 2 capsules each time. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, Chinese version) were used to assess therapeutic effects before treatment, after 4 weeks treatment and 9 weeks after treatment, respectively.ResultsAfter 4 weeks of treatment, the total effective rates were 86.7% (52/60) and 88.3% (53/60) in the acupuncture group and the western medication group, respectively, without significant difference (P>0.05). In 9 weeks after treatment, the total effective rates were 83.3% (50/60) and 61.7% (37/60) in the acupuncture group and the western medication group, respectively, with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). According to WOMAC and SF-36, the scores were all improved in both groups (P<0.05, P<0.01), with significant difference in follow-up visit of 9 weeks after treatment between the two groups (P<0.05, P<0.01), but not after 4 weeks of treatments (both P>0.05).ConclusionShort-term of therapeutic effects of acupuncture and oral administration of Glucosamine Hydrochloride on osteoarthritis of knee joints are similar, but long-term efficacy in the acupuncture group is better than that in the western medication group.