Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3119144 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2009 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

IntroductionThe literature has shown that subjective concepts lead to interobserver variations in the definitions and identifications of cephalometric landmarks. Observers must be trained and calibrated to conduct scientific research using cephalometric comparisons. In this study, we aimed to develop and test a computational model called Cyclops cephalometry in radiographic cephalometry training and calibration.MethodsThis system uses the concepts of evaluation process managers, examiners, and testers, thus affording uniformity in cephalometric evaluations. The system was tested with 5 orthodontists and 5 postgraduate students who located 28 landmarks in 10 lateral cephalometric radiographs before and after training.ResultsBefore training, the Student t test showed significant differences (P <0.05) in accuracy between the orthodontists and the students (71.4% and 54.9%, respectively). However, considerable improvement in accuracy was observed after training in both groups (86.5% and 83%, respectively), without significant differences (P = 0.30) between groups. Users of the system agreed about its usability aspects such as effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction.ConclusionsThis model was shown to be a useful and efficient tool in the calibration process, and might be helpful in various comparative cephalometric investigations.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,