Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3142500 Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2015 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare four methods of fixation in mandibular body fractures.Study designMechanical and photoelastic tests were performed using polyurethane and photoelastic resin mandibles, respectively. The study groups contained the following: (I), two miniplates of 2.0 mm; (II) one 2.0 mm plate and an Erich arch bar; (III) one 2.4 mm plate and an Erich arch bar, and (IV) one 2.0 mm plate and one 2.4 mm plate. The differences between the mean values were analyzed using Tukey's test, the Mann–Whitney test and the Bonferroni correction.ResultsGroup II recorded the lowest resistance, followed by groups I, IV and III. The photoelastic test confirmed the increase of tension in group II.ConclusionThe 2.4 mm system board in linear mandibular body fractures provided more resistance and the use of only one 2.0 mm plate in the central area of the mandible created higher tension.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
, , , , ,