Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3160643 Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the pressure dynamics in the trays caused by differences in the various impression materials and in the thickness of the relief provided for the trays.MethodsIn this study, two types of polyvinylsiloxane elastomers, one type of polyether elastomer and one type of alginate impression material were used. Pressure sensors were embedded at eight locations in a model of an edentulous maxilla, and used a simulation model covered with a pseudomucosa. For each impression material, the measurement was performed five times for each of the three types of trays, and the mean values were determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's HDS method, and the various pressure sensor values for each of the impression materials were compared 10 s and 20 s after the start of the measurement. Additionally, we compared differences among the three types of trays after 20 s.ResultsThe pressure values for sensors placed in the relief region tended to become uniform. Furthermore, we saw a tendency for the pressure to increase at the alveolar crests of the first molars on the left and right and at the posterior border of the palate, all of which support the denture, when relief was provided.ConclusionsThe above results suggest that making the final impression for the denture using the selective pressure technique, with consideration given to the pressure dynamic, may lead to a good outcome in terms of preservation of the alveolar ridge.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,