| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3167998 | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology | 2009 | 6 Pages |
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effect of continuous, intermittent passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and active scrubbing of irrigants with NaviTip FX (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT) in removing smear layer.Study designForty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into 5 test groups and subjected to final irrigation with 17% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl for 1 minute each using different activation methods: no activation (control), brushing with NaviTip FX, continuous PUI with irrigant delivered at pulp chamber, continuous PUI with irrigant delivered through the ultrasonic unit, and intermittent PUI. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope, and the data were analyzed using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests.ResultsNaviTip FX and intermittent PUI showed significantly lower smear score than other groups at the 3 mm level (P < .05).ConclusionsBoth brush and intermittent ultrasonic activation were effective in the removal of smear layer from the apical third.
