| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3168197 | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology | 2009 | 5 Pages |
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the apical seal of the Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha technique and the lateral compaction technique in combination with 3 sealers (AH-26, Apexit, and Sealite-Ultra).Study designSeventy extracted single-root teeth were used. Root canals were prepared with ProTaper rotary instruments. Six groups were formed: (I) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with AH-26; (II) lateral compaction technique with AH-26; (III) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Apexit; (IV) lateral compaction technique with Apexit; (V) Single-cone ProTaper gutta-percha with Sealite-Ultra; and (VI) lateral compaction technique with Sealite-Ultra. The fluid conductance of each specimen was measured after the 7th and 30th days using a fluid filtration method.ResultsWhen lateral compaction was performed, all sealers showed similar levels of leakage (P > .05). Using the single-cone technique, Sealite-Ultra showed more leakage than the others (P < .05). Comparing filling techniques, there was a significant difference only in the Sealite-Ultra groups (P < .05).ConclusionSingle-cone ProTaper gutta-percha and lateral compaction techniques showed similar sealing effect.
